Weblog
Articles
Film Reviews
Recipes
NMI Parity Check Error

Emerald Bay Photography

Resume
About
Contact

Archives for November 2003

November 26, 2003

The last few days have brought a thick, fluffy coat of snow to the region.

And all the while, I was sitting and waiting anxiously for the new arrival: my brandnew, awsome Canon EOS 10D.

Finally, late yesterday afternoon, it arrived. And what a beautiful beast it is.

I'll be gone over Turkey Day, so I'll try and give it a good workout and will post the results here upon my return.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING everybody!



November 20, 2003

Holy Shit.

I haven't laughed this hard in quite some time.

During a creative lull yesterday, I decided to browse a bit online, and came upon Lane Hickenbottom's site.

Now that guy's a freakin' genius with the camera. I honestly don't know what the hell he's doing working as a customer service minion at Cabela's.

But that's not why or about I was laughing. No. It was the article Lane posted here. An account of contemptuous unemployment, courtesy of Ryan Pederson (Kerry, are you taking notes?).

I recommend, if you have the time, to read the entire posting.
I honestly never knew that showering can be such an important action in a guy's day.
It did, however, confirm my only recently made discovery, that males hold a strange fascination with Little People (what's up with that, ladies?).
And next summer, I just *have* to try that tshirt-in-the-freezer trick. Pure genius.

So what do chicks do when they're bored and home alone? Easy. They either go shopping, or (if the weather is bad) watch a marathon of "Queer eye", "Sex and the City", and "The Victoria's Secret Fashion Show". Ooopps. Did I just divulge what I was doing last night?



November 19, 2003

Today's look at the bright side of life comes from my sister, who sent me a link to this highly entertaining satirical mini-movie about the Olympics (not for the faint-of-heart however...).

And could it be? Could it really be?
Is Silicon Valley truly *hiring* people again? The NYT reports.

The Image of the Day is drawn from my stock files, and yields a look at a somewhat unusual subject: the Goetheanum.

This building, located just outside the Swiss city of Basel and only a few miles from the town I grew up in, is one of the most important concrete structures of the 20th century. The interior is spectacular in itself, and it's well worth taking the Web Tour of the building for a closer look.

The Gotheanum was built according to a model made by Rudolf Steiner in March 1924, the spiritual leader of a philosophy called Anthroposophy. By many considered a cult (although harmless), it embraces a spiritual view of the human being and the cosmos, but its emphasis is on knowing, not faith. Part of the belief also expresses itself in the unusual building techniques the Goetheanum, as well as numerous other structures in the area, are examples of.

[]



November 18, 2003

Another email in regards to the NMI: Parity Check Error I've repeated written about, has prompted me to update my Error Reports page today.

Seems those darn DLink DWL-520+ wireless cards are really running a number on people's systems.
Although I've previously considered installing one too, I've in the meantime pretty much retired the thought - mainly because I cannot afford to have my system break down.

On The Bright Side however: Why not lighten your day with a little glimpse of paradise? Today's image was taken in Baja, while leisurely slumped in a hammock, contemplating life and dropping coconuts...

[View from a 
Hammock]

And although ripped off from Luke's site, I felt I just *had to* post this link to an article about wedding photographers. The scalding response from Mike Johnston only suits the monstrous accusation by CBS Market Watch, that placed wedding photographers on the list of "ten most overpaid jobs".

For that, Chris Plummer, the Market Watch author, should be condemned to have to photograph weddings for all eternity - in that nice hot place commonly known as Hell... and *without* pay...

Oh, no wait - that's right. I forgot.
Photographing weddings actually involves *skill* ...



November 16, 2003

Image of the Day: Heaven's Edge

[Heaven's Edge]



November 14, 2003

So yesterday I get this little letter from the Superior Court for the State of California.

It states that I'm eligible to claim a voucher from Microsoft as part of their 1.1 billion "unfair competition" settlement with the State, because I bought a copy of Windows as part of my last computer purchase (not like I really had a choice there - but I suppose that's besides the point). Enclosed is a 3-page claim form.

At first I'm somewhat pleased that the good people from the great State of California and the even better people from Microsoft have worked together to get the little consumer - me - some money back. Not that that would really make up for the hours of technical mayhem, caused by the many glaring flaws and security holes in the Windows operating system. But - hey.

Then I start to look more closely, and discover that the voucher would be valued at a whopping 16 bucks. Not that that would be cash or anything. No buying Starbucks Frappuchinos with this one. No, no. It's actually a voucher that can be used (and I quote) "towards the purchase of desktop, laptop or tablet computers, printers, scanners, monitors, keyboards, pointing devices (e.g. mouse or trackball) and generally available software made by any manufacturer" - but preferably Microsoft, right? (And you show me any piece of software or hardware that you can buy for 16 bucks or less - so you'll end up paying on top of it anyway.)

Another look at the claim form also reveals that my phone number, as well as my email address (which is optional however), and either my Social Security Number or a copy of my drivers license is required to file the claim.

Excuse me?

So correct me if I'm wrong: but I'm supposed to give up my privacy (to whom? Microsoft? I can't wait for all that wonderful marketing material I will receive in response, or the many tele-marketing calls during dinner after Microsoft has sold my information to the world) in exchange for a lousy 16 bucks? And I certainly didn't see any opt-out language on that claim form either...

So let's see: Microsoft resolves its antitrust problems in California, gets a bunch of valuable customer information they can input into their databases to market to and/or sell at will (cause who's gonna stop them, really?) - and they have a chance at not only recouping their 16 bucks by having the voucher redeemed on one of their products, but potentially also *make* more money if the voucher is used in conjunction with a bigger and pricier purchase that the customer wouldn't have made, had he not been forced to redeem the voucher, or give up his claim to the settlement?

I'll be damned.
If this isn't the world's most brilliant marketing ploy, then I don't know what is.
I can see ole' Bill rubbing his palms and mumbling to himself: "Bring on the anti-trust settlements! By all means!"



November 13, 2003

Thanks to Kerry Liles (yet again) for sending me a link to a wonderfully enthralling site: The Prokudin-Gorskii Photographic Record of the Russian Empire on the eve of World War I and the coming revolution.

"Outfitted with a specially equipped railroad car darkroom provided by Tsar Nicholas II, and in possession of two permits that granted him access to restricted areas and cooperation from the empire's bureaucracy, Prokudin-Gorskii documented the Russian Empire around 1907 through 1915."

Astonishingly however, the Library of Congress (who bought the collection of photographs from Prokudin-Gorskii's heirs in 1948), decided to scan the glass plates and, through an innovative process known as digichromatography, produced brilliant color images.

Definitely worth a look. Or if you happen to live in Washington D.C., by all means, drop by the Library of Congress for a closer look at the current exhibit of Prokudin-Gorskii's images.

Also - Luke has written up a good comeback to my article from yesterday. For the kind of photography he does, he's got some pretty convincing words in favor of smaller and lighter equipment. I would guess however, that a professional nature, wildlife, or sports photographer would have something more to say about the virtues of big and high-end (and expensive) equipment. After all - they have to sell their images to make a living. And no matter how good in composition, if an image doesn't check out quality-wise, no photo buyer, ad agency, or designer will touch it with a ten foot pole.



November 12, 2003

What is more important in an image - the quality of its appearance, or capturing that one unique moment in time?

A while back, Luke and I were entwined in a lengthy email conversation on the subject. It had sprung out of a discussion about camera equipment, and how much camera do you really need? Is it better to have the latest and greatest in equipment, the sharpest lens, the steadiest tripod - but you only pull it out when you really want to, and hence you miss a lot of shots you would have otherwise captured had you carried a smaller, but inferior-quality camera with you at all times?

Luke shoots with a small digital camera, and despite its shortcomings (he can't make nice big prints from the pics he takes, his camera is slow to focus, and has no settings for more creative approaches such as extreme macros, mirror-lockup for long exposures etc.), he can carry it always with him and is right there, ready to capture the moment when it presents itself. With the excellent eye he possesses, that happens more often than not.

So what happens if he captures that one unbelievable history-making event every photographer is waiting and living for? And what if the quality of the image sucks as a result of the small and inferior equipment? Will the image make less of an impact on photography as an industry or human kind as a whole?

Point in case is the image below.

[Howler Monkey]

I took it a few years ago, in the jungles of the Guatemalan ruin city of Tikal. The image is of a black howler monkey, sitting on a branch. I was almost at eye-level with him - after seeing the group move through the trees right above me and quickly climbing an overgrown temple in anticipation of their route. I ended up perched precariously between a swaying tree branch and the little more stable crumbling rock of the ruin, shooting with my Canon 10s, a F4 75-300mm Canon Ultrasonic zoom lens, no tripod, and on 200 Fuji Sensia slide film.

The problem was that howler monkeys are very shy, and at that time, they were also severly decimated after a yellow fever epidemic had killed off a good part of the local population. So seeing them in the first place was a nothing short of a miracle.

This group was moving through the tree crowns at an amazing speed. My howler was resting on a branch, maybe 10 feet away, and for less than a minute. For most of it, we were playing a game of peekaboo - he would stare at me curiously, but the moment I'd return his gaze, he would shyly look away.

I didn't want to scare him off, hoping for a good clean shot, but the only chance I got was when he was getting ready to take off again. He raised his face to the sky, a lone pinhole beam of light through the dense tree canopy hit his eye, and that's when I fired my camera. The sound of the shutter must have scared him, because he was gone in a flash.

Later, upon getting my slides back from the lab, I realized to my disappoinment that the shot turned out blurry - mostly due to the fact that the light meter in my camera hadn't been able to cope with the drastic colors of the monkey's jet-black fur and the random, blindingly bright sun beams streaming through the leafy canopy. The camera had made the exposure too long for it to be sharp, and I simply hadn't had enough time to make manual adjustments.

Yet I still treasure this image. I makes me fondly remember my close encounter with these awesome animals, and I wouldn't trade that for anything in the world.

Will I ever be able to sell or publish this image though? Probably not. Very few people (aside from the random stragglers stumbling across my website) will ever see it. Had I had a top-of-the-line pro camera and a superfast wildlife lens, I might have gotten the shot in all its glorious crispness, and it might have been marketable.

Plus - should the howler monkey ever become extinct (heaven forbids, although their status is already threatened), this image could have contributed to preserving the memory of this glorious species for many future generations to come.

As it is - it's nothing more than a blurry image of a howler monkey quite likely nobody will ever want to take a second look at - but me.



November 11, 2003

Film Review: The Matrix - Revolutions

A rainy and cold Saturday afternoon, 1pm, November 8, 2003:
Three days after the official launch of The Matrix: Revolutions, I sat in a darkened theater room, wondering if I was the only one who had pilgramaged here today more out of a sense of duty towards finishing the story, than excitement for finding out what will happen to the characters in the movie. The lackluster "Revolutions" had seen to that. And one good look around was confirmation - it was opening weekend for one of the year's most anticipated movies, and the theater was half empty. ... continued...



November 10, 2003

Yesterday I went to a slide show presentation of photographer Bruce Barnbaum, at the Central Oregon Environmental Center in Bend.

I had known some, if not much, of his work before hand, but the trigger to go was a big thumbs-up by a friend of mine who had attended one of his workshops and raved about his imagery. She told me Bruce had studied with Ansel Adams, and had worked extensively with another fine black & white photographer, the much-admired John Sexton.

And yet, the evening had two decidedly polar opposites - one that left a bad taste on my palate for the human ego; the other that left the photographer in me inspired.

Truthfully though, I almost walked out of the presentation after Bruce's exhausting half-hour intro that was really little more than a pseudo-funny, thinly-veiled sales pitch - and was all about me, me, me, and me.

How his book publisher screwed him. How he got inspired for this series of four books he was putting together. Oh, and btw - you can buy the first one in the series right here for 80 bucks. And since I'm such an important artist, but at the same time a charitable guy, you can also buy one of my 16 x 20 prints for only 750 bucks, instead of the usual 900.

Gimme a break, Bruce. They weren't even beautiful Gelatin Silver prints, just ordinary darkroom prints. And let's face it: no unmatted, unframed, 16 x 20 print is worth 900 bucks if the artist is still alive ...

He did however sort of redeemed himself as the slide show started. His imagery was truly exquisite. Astonishing curves, patterns, and designs emerged from ordinary locations and objects such as fern, rock canyons, and ancient cathedrals, teased onto the negative by lots of patience, a critical eye and an obviously enormous amount of time spent in the darkroom.
Most of his photographs had captured a mystical quality of light (by means of 3 - 15 minute exposures) rarely showcased by less patient photographers.

And yet I left the presentation the moment the slide show ended, and with a rather bitter taste towards Bruce, the person. In the end, that also really diminished the impact of his photographs, no matter how beautiful they were to look at.

In contrast though, I remembered a slide show by Galen Rowell I attended a few years ago - how Galen had lost no time dwelling on himself or his achievements, but rather passionately talked about the things he deeply cared about: photography as a tool for helping preserve the world's last wild places, and spurring the fight for freeing his beloved Tibet. His narration of the images in the slide show were all put in these contexts, making them (aside from being beautiful works of art) so very meaningful.

That evening I lingered on, bought one of his books (for 35 bucks), had it signed, and left the event with my mind and heart brimming with Galen's infectious enthusiam about the need to preserve the environment for future generations.

And that enthusiasm has stayed with me over the years - together with a deep admiration not only for Galen, the photographer, but also Galen, the human being.

And should I ever have the kind of money where I can spend 900 bucks on a print, I'd chose Galen's art over Bruce's any day ...



November 8, 2003

It was bound to happen.

*Somebody* with a camera and a good eye was going to document the Southern California wildfires more in-depth and with more real-feel than any of the newspaper journalists could have.

Kudos to Matt Artz for his excellent and heart-wrenching photo essay on the topic.



November 7, 2003

Are you overworked?

If you can see this picture move, then you probably are. ;-)
Maybe you urgently need to take a break, or go home and relax, and STOP WORKING SO DAMN MUCH.

[Moving Pic]

On a less surreal note: The NYT movie critic somberly deconstructs "The Matrix: Revolutions" with lines like: "'Reloaded' was certainly a lumpy, gaseous treatise of a movie, but viewers of 'Revolutions' may find themselves looking back on it fondly." Ouch.

And another noteworthy quote: "Mr. Reeves, perhaps worried that he was showing too much range, has purged himself of all expression apart from a worried frown and a sorrowful grimace." True, Keanu could certainly benefit from a few years at some renowned New York acting school - but did the critic really have to put it *this* harshly?

Well, I suppose, I'll find out for myself this weekend. Loyal readers can expect to see my review of the movie early next week.



November 6, 2003

Image of the Day: Striped Bug

I'm cheating today. The weather's been too miserable and dreary outside as to actually point my camera at anything worthy.

So I'm substituting with a happy pic of a striped bug. I took the image a few years back, in Guatemala, and I have yet to figure out the name of the critter (if an alert reader happens to be in the know - by all means, pass it on....). Mostly though, I was intrigued by its neat striped wing, and so I decided to make that the focus, rather than the whole bug.

[Striped Bug]

And in an entirely different universe - David Pogue poignantly comments on the woes of modern-day customer service (especially by phone companies) in a NYT Circuits bit today.

Boy, could I add on to that. From an AT&T service rep telling me that the long-distance charges on my phone are originated by my "surfing websites that are, say, located in Europe or Australia" (that's when I still had dial-up), over MCI screwing me out of promised rebates, to Handspring refusing to cover my PDA while still under warranty.

It's a sad, sad world we live in - where large companies get away with ripping off their customers, one dime at a time...



November 5, 2003

It's still snowing.

Yet, at least this is the perfect time to do a bunch of undistracted work on my websites.

For shutterbugs - go check out the new section of Panorama shots over at www.emeraldbayphoto.com.



November 3, 2003

It snowed (here in Central Oregon) yesterday.

And not just a dusting.
Real snow.
4 inches or so.
Roads are ice rinks.
Trees look like dusted with powdered sugar.
The river below my house is half-way frozen over.

And yet I couldn't resist venturing out. With snow, it is hard to measure the light properly though - especially for the light metering system in my lame little Sony digital camera. Hence, today's pic is rather on the bla side. But I felt obliged to post *something*. So here it is.

[]

First Snow on a Little Orange Flower

But while my day was BLA overall, poor Luke experienced a complete meltdown. All his digital images and blog entries from the past 7 years are gone. And his stuff was so awfully good. This sucks. Alert and compassionate readers should donate to him, so he can at least buy himself the Sigma SD9 (or SD10) he's been secretly lusting after, and make us happy with his images.