
|
Archives for November 2003
November 26, 2003
The last few days have brought a thick, fluffy
coat of snow to the region.
And all the while, I was sitting and waiting
anxiously for the new arrival: my brandnew,
awsome Canon EOS 10D.
Finally, late yesterday afternoon, it arrived.
And what a beautiful beast it is.
I'll be gone over Turkey Day, so I'll try and give
it a good workout and will post the results here
upon my return.
HAPPY THANKSGIVING everybody!
November 20, 2003
Holy Shit.
I haven't laughed this hard in quite some time.
During a creative lull yesterday, I decided to
browse a bit online, and came upon
Lane Hickenbottom's site.
Now that guy's a freakin' genius with the camera.
I honestly don't know what the hell he's doing
working as a customer service minion at
Cabela's.
But that's not why or about I was laughing.
No. It was the article Lane posted
here. An account of contemptuous unemployment,
courtesy of
Ryan Pederson (Kerry, are you taking notes?).
I recommend, if you have the time, to read the entire
posting. I honestly never knew that
showering can be such an important action in a
guy's day. It did, however, confirm my only recently
made discovery, that males hold
a strange fascination with Little People (what's up
with that, ladies?). And next summer, I just *have*
to try that tshirt-in-the-freezer trick. Pure genius.
So what do chicks do when they're bored and home alone?
Easy. They either go shopping, or (if the weather is
bad) watch a marathon of
"Queer eye", "Sex and the City", and "The Victoria's
Secret Fashion Show". Ooopps. Did I just divulge
what I was doing last night?
November 19, 2003
Today's look at the bright side of life
comes from my sister, who sent me a link
to this
highly entertaining satirical mini-movie
about the Olympics (not for the faint-of-heart
however...).
And could it be? Could it really be?
Is Silicon Valley truly *hiring* people again?
The NYT
reports.
The Image of the Day is drawn from my
stock files, and yields a look at a somewhat
unusual subject: the
Goetheanum.
This building, located just outside
the Swiss city of Basel and only a few miles from
the town I grew up in, is one of the most
important concrete structures of the 20th century.
The interior is spectacular in itself, and it's
well worth taking the
Web Tour of the building for a closer look.
The Gotheanum was built according to a model made by
Rudolf Steiner in March 1924, the
spiritual leader of a philosophy called
Anthroposophy. By many considered a cult (although
harmless), it embraces a spiritual view of the
human being and the cosmos, but
its emphasis is
on knowing, not faith. Part of the belief also
expresses itself in the unusual building techniques
the Goetheanum, as well as numerous other structures
in the area, are examples of.
November 18, 2003
Another email in regards to the
NMI: Parity Check Error I've repeated written
about, has prompted me to update my
Error Reports page today.
Seems those darn DLink DWL-520+ wireless cards are
really running a number on people's systems.
Although I've previously considered installing one
too, I've in the meantime pretty much retired the
thought - mainly because I cannot afford to have
my system break down.
On The Bright Side however: Why not lighten your
day with a little glimpse of paradise? Today's
image was taken in Baja, while leisurely slumped
in a hammock, contemplating life and dropping
coconuts...
And although ripped off from
Luke's site, I felt I just *had to* post this
link to an
article about wedding photographers.
The scalding response from Mike Johnston only
suits the monstrous accusation by CBS Market Watch,
that placed wedding photographers on the list of
"ten most overpaid jobs".
For that, Chris Plummer, the Market Watch author,
should be condemned to have to photograph weddings
for all eternity - in that nice hot place
commonly known as Hell... and *without* pay...
Oh, no wait - that's right. I forgot.
Photographing weddings actually involves *skill* ...
November 16, 2003
Image of the Day: Heaven's Edge
November 14, 2003
So yesterday I get this little letter from the
Superior Court for the State of California.
It states that I'm eligible to claim a voucher
from Microsoft as part of their 1.1 billion
"unfair competition" settlement with the State, because I
bought a copy of Windows as part of my last
computer purchase (not like I really had a choice
there - but I suppose that's besides the point).
Enclosed is a 3-page claim form.
At first I'm somewhat pleased that the good people
from the great State of California and the even
better people from Microsoft have worked together
to get the little consumer - me - some money back.
Not that that would really make up for the hours
of technical mayhem, caused by the many glaring
flaws and security
holes in the Windows operating system. But - hey.
Then I start to look more closely, and discover
that the voucher would be valued at a whopping
16 bucks. Not that that would be cash or anything.
No buying Starbucks Frappuchinos with this one.
No, no. It's actually a voucher that can be used
(and I quote) "towards the purchase of desktop,
laptop or tablet computers, printers, scanners,
monitors, keyboards, pointing devices (e.g. mouse
or trackball) and generally available software made
by any manufacturer" - but preferably Microsoft,
right? (And you show me any piece of software or
hardware that you can buy for 16 bucks or less - so
you'll end up paying on top of it anyway.)
Another look at the claim form also reveals that
my phone number, as well as my email address (which
is optional however), and either my Social Security
Number or a copy of my drivers license is required
to file the claim.
Excuse me?
So correct me if I'm wrong: but I'm supposed to
give up my privacy (to whom? Microsoft? I can't
wait for all that wonderful marketing material
I will receive in response, or the many tele-marketing
calls during dinner after Microsoft has sold my
information to the world) in
exchange for a lousy 16 bucks? And I certainly
didn't see any opt-out language on that claim
form either...
So let's see: Microsoft resolves its antitrust
problems in California, gets a bunch of valuable
customer information they can input into their
databases to market to and/or sell at will
(cause who's gonna stop them, really?) - and they
have a chance at not only recouping their 16 bucks
by having the voucher redeemed on one of their
products, but potentially also *make* more money
if the voucher is used in conjunction with a bigger
and pricier purchase that the customer wouldn't
have made, had he not been forced to redeem the
voucher, or give up his claim to the settlement?
I'll be damned.
If this isn't the world's most brilliant marketing
ploy, then I don't know what is.
I can see ole' Bill rubbing his palms and mumbling
to himself: "Bring on the anti-trust settlements!
By all means!"
November 13, 2003
Thanks to Kerry Liles (yet again) for sending me
a link to a wonderfully enthralling site:
The Prokudin-Gorskii Photographic Record of
the Russian Empire on the eve of World War I
and the coming revolution.
"Outfitted with a specially equipped railroad
car darkroom provided by Tsar Nicholas II, and
in possession of two permits that granted him
access to restricted areas and cooperation from
the empire's bureaucracy, Prokudin-Gorskii
documented the Russian Empire around 1907
through 1915."
Astonishingly however, the Library of Congress
(who bought the collection of photographs from
Prokudin-Gorskii's heirs in 1948), decided
to scan the glass plates and, through an
innovative process known as digichromatography,
produced brilliant color images.
Definitely worth a look. Or if you happen to live
in Washington D.C., by all means, drop by the
Library of Congress for a closer look at the
current exhibit of Prokudin-Gorskii's images.
Also - Luke has written up a good
comeback to my article from
yesterday. For the kind of photography he does,
he's got some pretty convincing words in favor of
smaller and lighter equipment. I would guess
however, that a professional nature, wildlife, or
sports photographer would have something more to
say about the virtues of big and high-end (and
expensive) equipment. After all - they have to sell
their images to make a living. And no matter how
good in composition, if an image doesn't check out
quality-wise, no photo buyer, ad agency, or designer
will touch it with a ten foot pole.
November 12, 2003
What is more important in an image - the quality
of its appearance, or
capturing that one unique moment in time?
A while back,
Luke and I were entwined in a lengthy email
conversation on the subject. It had sprung out of
a discussion about camera equipment, and how much
camera do you really need? Is it better to have the
latest and greatest in equipment, the sharpest lens,
the steadiest tripod - but you only pull it out
when you really want to, and hence you miss a lot
of shots you would have otherwise captured had you
carried a smaller, but inferior-quality camera
with you at all times?
Luke shoots with a small digital camera,
and despite its shortcomings (he can't make nice big prints
from the pics he takes, his camera is slow to focus,
and has no settings for more creative approaches such
as extreme macros, mirror-lockup for long exposures etc.),
he can carry it always with him
and is right there, ready to capture the moment
when it presents itself. With the excellent eye
he possesses, that happens more often than not.
So what happens if he captures that one unbelievable
history-making event every photographer is waiting
and living for? And what if the quality of the
image sucks as a result of the small and inferior
equipment? Will the image make less of an impact
on photography as an industry or human kind as a
whole?
Point in case is the image below.
I took it a few years ago, in the jungles of the Guatemalan
ruin city of
Tikal. The image is of a
black howler monkey,
sitting on a branch. I was almost at eye-level with
him - after seeing the group move through the trees
right above me and quickly climbing an overgrown temple
in anticipation of their route. I ended up perched
precariously between a swaying tree branch and the
little more stable crumbling rock of the ruin,
shooting with my Canon 10s, a F4 75-300mm Canon
Ultrasonic zoom lens,
no tripod, and on 200 Fuji Sensia slide film.
The problem was that howler monkeys are very
shy, and at that time, they were
also severly decimated after a yellow fever
epidemic had killed
off a good part of the local population.
So seeing them in the first place
was a nothing short of a miracle.
This group was moving through the tree crowns
at an amazing speed. My howler was resting on
a branch, maybe 10 feet away, and for less than
a minute. For most of it, we were playing a
game of peekaboo -
he would stare at me curiously, but the moment
I'd return his gaze, he would shyly look away.
I didn't want to scare him off, hoping for a good
clean shot, but the only chance I got was when he
was getting ready to take off again. He raised his
face to the sky, a lone pinhole beam of light
through the dense tree canopy hit his eye, and
that's when I fired my camera. The sound of the
shutter must have
scared him, because he was gone in a flash.
Later, upon getting my slides back from the lab,
I realized to my disappoinment that the shot
turned out blurry - mostly due to the fact that
the light meter in my camera hadn't been able to
cope with the drastic colors of the monkey's
jet-black fur and the random, blindingly bright
sun beams streaming through the leafy canopy.
The camera had made the exposure too long for it
to be sharp, and I simply hadn't had enough time
to make manual adjustments.
Yet I still treasure this image. I makes me
fondly remember my close encounter with these awesome
animals, and I wouldn't trade that for anything
in the world.
Will I ever be able to sell or publish this image
though? Probably not. Very few people (aside from
the random stragglers stumbling across my website)
will ever see it. Had I had a top-of-the-line pro
camera and a superfast wildlife lens, I might
have gotten the shot in all its glorious crispness, and
it might have been marketable.
Plus - should the
howler monkey ever become extinct (heaven forbids,
although their status is already
threatened), this image could have contributed
to preserving the memory of this glorious species
for many future generations to come.
As it is - it's nothing more than a blurry image
of a howler monkey quite likely nobody will ever
want to take a second look at - but me.
November 11, 2003
Film Review: The Matrix - Revolutions
A rainy and cold Saturday afternoon, 1pm,
November 8, 2003: Three days after the official
launch of
The Matrix: Revolutions, I sat in a darkened
theater room, wondering if I was the only
one who had pilgramaged here today more out of a
sense of duty towards finishing the story, than
excitement for finding out what will happen to the
characters in the movie. The lackluster "Revolutions" had seen to that.
And one good look around was confirmation - it
was opening weekend for one of the year's most
anticipated movies, and the theater was half empty.
... continued...
November 10, 2003
Yesterday I went to a slide show presentation of
photographer
Bruce Barnbaum,
at the Central Oregon Environmental Center in Bend.
I had known some, if not much, of his work before hand,
but the trigger to go was a big thumbs-up by a
friend of mine who had attended one of his workshops
and raved about his imagery. She told me Bruce had studied
with Ansel Adams, and had worked extensively
with another fine
black & white photographer, the much-admired
John Sexton.
And yet, the evening had two decidedly
polar opposites - one that left a bad taste on my
palate for the human ego; the other that left the
photographer in me inspired.
Truthfully though, I almost walked out of the presentation after
Bruce's exhausting half-hour intro that was really
little more than a pseudo-funny, thinly-veiled
sales pitch - and was all about me, me, me, and me.
How his book publisher screwed him. How he got
inspired for this series of four books he was
putting together. Oh, and btw - you can buy the first
one in the series right here for 80 bucks. And since
I'm such an important artist, but at the same time
a charitable guy, you can also buy one of my
16 x 20 prints for only 750 bucks, instead of the
usual 900.
Gimme a break, Bruce. They weren't even beautiful
Gelatin Silver prints, just ordinary darkroom prints.
And let's face it: no unmatted, unframed,
16 x 20 print is worth 900 bucks if the artist is
still alive ...
He did however sort of redeemed himself as the
slide show started. His
imagery was truly exquisite.
Astonishing curves, patterns, and designs emerged
from ordinary locations and objects such as fern,
rock canyons, and ancient cathedrals, teased onto
the negative by lots of patience, a critical eye and
an obviously enormous amount of time spent in the
darkroom.
Most of his photographs had captured a mystical
quality of light (by means of 3 - 15 minute exposures)
rarely showcased by less patient photographers.
And yet I left the presentation the moment
the slide show ended, and with a rather bitter taste
towards Bruce, the person. In the end, that also really
diminished the impact of his photographs, no matter
how beautiful they were to look at.
In contrast though, I remembered a slide show by
Galen
Rowell I attended a few years ago - how Galen
had lost no time dwelling on himself or his achievements, but
rather passionately talked about the things he
deeply cared about: photography as a tool for
helping preserve the world's last wild places,
and spurring the fight for freeing his beloved
Tibet. His narration of the images in the slide
show were all put in these contexts, making
them (aside from being beautiful works of art)
so very meaningful.
That evening I lingered on, bought one of his books (for
35 bucks), had it signed, and left the event with
my mind and heart brimming with Galen's infectious
enthusiam about the need to preserve the environment
for future generations.
And that enthusiasm has stayed with me over the
years - together with a deep admiration not only for
Galen, the photographer, but also Galen, the human being.
And should I ever have the kind of money where I can
spend 900 bucks on a print, I'd chose Galen's art
over Bruce's any day ...
November 8, 2003
It was bound to happen.
*Somebody* with a camera and a good eye was
going to document the Southern California
wildfires more in-depth and with more real-feel
than any of the newspaper journalists could have.
Kudos to Matt Artz for his excellent and heart-wrenching
photo essay on the topic.
November 7, 2003
Are you overworked?
If you can see this picture move, then you probably are. ;-)
Maybe you urgently need to take a break, or
go home and relax, and STOP WORKING SO DAMN MUCH.
On a less surreal note: The NYT movie critic somberly
deconstructs "The Matrix: Revolutions" with lines
like: "'Reloaded' was certainly a lumpy, gaseous treatise
of a movie, but viewers of 'Revolutions' may find
themselves looking back on it fondly." Ouch.
And another noteworthy quote: "Mr. Reeves,
perhaps worried that he was showing too much
range, has purged himself of all expression
apart from a worried frown and a sorrowful
grimace." True, Keanu could certainly benefit
from a few years at some renowned New York acting
school - but did the critic really have to put it *this*
harshly?
Well, I suppose, I'll find out for myself this weekend.
Loyal readers can expect to see my review of the
movie early next week.
November 6, 2003
Image of the Day: Striped Bug
I'm cheating today. The weather's been too miserable
and dreary outside as to actually point my camera
at anything worthy.
So I'm substituting with a
happy pic of a striped bug. I took the image a few
years back, in Guatemala, and I have yet to figure
out the name of the critter (if an alert reader
happens to be in the know - by all means,
pass it
on....). Mostly though, I was intrigued by its
neat striped wing, and so I decided to make that
the focus, rather than the whole bug.
And in an entirely different universe - David Pogue
poignantly comments on the woes of modern-day
customer service (especially by phone companies)
in a
NYT Circuits bit today.
Boy, could I add on to that. From an AT&T service
rep telling me that the long-distance charges on
my phone are originated by my "surfing websites that
are, say, located in Europe or Australia" (that's when
I still had dial-up), over MCI screwing me out of
promised rebates, to
Handspring refusing to cover my PDA while still
under warranty.
It's a sad, sad world we live in - where large
companies get away with ripping off their customers,
one dime at a time...
November 5, 2003
It's still snowing.
Yet, at least this is the perfect time to do a bunch
of undistracted work on my websites.
For shutterbugs - go check out
the new section of Panorama shots over
at
www.emeraldbayphoto.com.
November 3, 2003
It snowed (here in Central Oregon) yesterday.
And not just a dusting.
Real snow.
4 inches or so.
Roads are ice rinks.
Trees look like dusted with powdered sugar.
The river below my house is half-way frozen over.
And yet I couldn't resist venturing out. With snow, it is hard to measure
the light properly though - especially for the light
metering system in my lame little Sony digital camera.
Hence, today's pic is rather on the bla side.
But I felt obliged to post *something*.
So here it is.
First Snow on a Little Orange Flower
But while my day was BLA overall, poor Luke
experienced a complete meltdown. All his digital
images and blog entries from the past 7 years are
gone. And his stuff was so awfully good. This sucks.
Alert and compassionate readers should donate to him,
so he can at least buy himself the Sigma SD9
(or SD10) he's been secretly lusting after, and make us happy
with his images.

|
|
|