
|
Archives for March 2005
March 31, 2005 - Top Gun Revisited
Back in 1986, when I was an impressionable 15-year
old teenager, I went to see a little movie called
Top Gun. Stepping out of the theater, I couldn't
decide who I should have the bigger crush on - Tom Cruise
or Val Kilmer. Never mind that the movie was in
essence a two-hour long commercial for the American
Navy. That wasn't important back then. What was
important were the facts that it featured two
seriously hot guys, a scorching soundtrack, and
some adrenaline-inducing fligth sequences.
So last night - maybe out of boredom, maybe out
of a sudden notion to recapture a bit of my teenage years - I
watched the movie on HBO again.
Most of all, I was surprised. Almost 20 years after its
debut, the movie still held an unexpected amount
of appeal. Yes, it's still a very long ad
for the Navy. Yes, the story line is still a
bit thin, banking mostly on the charm of its
actors, the heart-pumping soundtrack, and the
testosterone-laced, mind-blowing, through-the-air-hurling-at-6-Gs
action scenes.
But - I found myself gripping my chair
during the turbulent (and very effective)
flight sequences. I tapped my foot to the
energetic tunes of such as oldies-but-goldies
as Cheap Trick, Miami Sound Machine, and yes,
Kenny Loggins. And I surprised myself by seriously
enjoying the eye-candy that were Cruise and Kilmer
back then - so beautiful and glorious in the splendor
of their youth.
Although I was tired, I watched the movie to
its very end. I even watched the credits. And
I remembered an old work collegue who had told
tales of being an extra in the movie, during
his time with the Navy at Miramar.
I admit to having had a serious flashback to my
teenage years. But I also found that I really
enjoyed seeing the movie again. Because good
movies never lose their appeal, and they
never die. And - I still
can't decide who to have the bigger crush on:
the 20-something Cruise or Kilmer.
March 30, 2005: Survived
Phew.
I can't believe I've survived this last week
and a half. And I'm still sane. At least sort of.
I like my insanity in small doses, you see.
So, blissfully ignorant of any future events coming
my way, I set out
to do my taxes at the beginning of last week. And
since I have to do them for
my own biz as well as
my hubby's (and I happen to be a stickler for maximizing
my deductions), I can get carried away and end
up in tax hell for 4 days. And so I did, just like
every year. But in the exact moment
as I jublilantly e-filed everything, mentally and
giddily already spending the refund on some
shiny new studio equipment, I received a
phone call from my mother-in-law, announcing
that she was coming down from Washington State
over Easter for a few days - and she was bringing my 2-year
old nephew.
Now don't get me wrong. I love my mom-in-law.
She's truly awesome. The angels (or devils)
in charge of assigning mother-in-laws to unsuspecting
brides took pity on me and gave me a really
great one. And
my nephew, with
his charming smile and tightly-curled hair,
is the cutest little bugger you'll ever see.
But - he's also 2 years old. Which of course
means that he knows the meaning of the word
"NO", and he's not afraid to use it. Especially
if you want him not to throw the food he's been
chewing for the past 10 minutes on the
floor, or chase the cat around the house, squealing
with an alien-like sound that is supposed to
signal delight, but in reality makes the eardrums
of every adult (and animal) contract in pain
and finally explode. Plus, the moment he
ruffles his forehead, juts out his lower lip,
and gets that stubborn stare in his eyes,
you know you've lost the battle already.
He happens to be gifted too. For example, he
has an extra-sensory perceptional talent that allows
him to find screwdrivers. Anywhere. Even where
I could have sworn - on my grandmothers hallowed grave -
there weren't any. That, in conjunction with
his other knack of knowing exactly where
every power outlet is in the entire house, makes
for an entertaining easter-egg-sort-of-hunt.
For him at least. I was less enthused to see
him stick the screwdrivers into the outlets.
But those are details. The thing that really
wore me out was the incredible energy he
directed at general mischief. One moment he would be
smiling his sweetest smile at you, the next
he was climbing a chair, only to turn around,
beam at you, and then have his little head
hit the wood floor with a deeply resounding
"thump". The tears wouldn't last, and 10 minutes
later, he was back, doing the same exact thing
again. Who ever said human beings learn from
experience?
It took mostly two people, sometimes three,
roughly 16 hours every day to keep the kid from
killing himself. So why in the world would people
ever want more than one child? How could
they possibly keep up and keep the kids alive?
It's one of those unsolved mysteries to me.
And sometimes I think, I wouldn't mind keeping
it that way. In the very least, I was pretty
happy to see the kid return back where it came
from. Although I will miss seeing his sweet
smile. But I'm also pretty damn happy to have my sanity back.
March 23, 3005 - Mistakes
Erring is human, right?
The question is however how much erring can and
should a newspaper be allowed to subject its
readers to before one cancels the subscription?
Point in case: The
Bulletin, our local attempt at daily news coverage.
Today, in its infinite wisdom, it printed on its
front page - under the headline Panel calls for
two tax districts for sheriff levy the
following paragraph:
"Editor's note: The Bulletin corrects all
errors in fact that appear in the newspaper.
The errors in a story published Tuesday about
taxes to support the sheriff's office and county
jail were so broad that they could not be
corrected outside the context of the full story.
Therefore, working with county officials and the
sheriff's office, we have rewritten the story
in its entirety. We regret these mistakes."
You're SO not forgiven. I hope the reporter and
editor got either fired, or at least their
wrists spanked.
Conveniently, the paper also omitted both the
faulty, as well as the rewritten one today, from
its online content.
Leave no traces ... not even in the interest
of the public....
And so back to doing my taxes I go - keeping in
mind that I will have to start saving up for
the insane tax hike the corrupt sheriff of this lovely
county has in mind for us property owners ...
March 9, 2005: Celebrity Blogging
You know that something is hip and has reached critical mass, when marketing and PR people
are able to talk their A-list celebrities into doing
it. No longer the sole domain of nerds, geeks,
would-be-journalists, and other attention-seeking
saps, seems this has happened with blogging now
(what? does this mean, that geekiness is cool - again?).
Last night, I happened to catch an old episode
of "Saturday Night Live", hosted by
Matthew McConaughey. He was pretty damn funny in it, so
today, in a minute of boredom (ok, procrastination),
I decided to see what the boy's been up to
lately (since I don't recall seeimg him in any
movies since "Reign of Fire").
To my big surprise I found
this Stream-of-Consciousness blog he's been
keeping, while on the road with a truck
and an airstream trailer to promote his new
movie
Sahara.
In his blog, he muses:
"Ahhhh ... a few nice days and
nights in New York City. I stayed in a hotel
for the first time in a while - room service,
a massage and a fireplace for two nights is
pretty fine. Not better or worse than my
Airstream, just different and nice. I went
out to one of my favorite spots last night,
Minetta Tavern, a great neighborhood bar
where you can hear lots a good bullsh--.
Saw some New York friends, ate, drank,
joined in the bullsh--. After 15 days on the
road, it was time for a night "out." It was
what the doctor ordered, ending with a 3 a.m.
pizza delivery, if you know what I mean."
And another gem:
"Five inches of snow lies
outside my open Airstream door here in a
chilly Philly RV park outside of Jersey.
Comin' out of the shower station at 8 a.m.
this morning in my robe and Uggs carrying a
cup of coffee, I was walking on the sidewalk,
turning a corner, and suddenly my feet were
above my head and I was on my ass in the
snow. Hit a frozen patch and busted my ass!
After noticing I hadn't broken any bones, I
had to lie there in the snow for a moment
and have a good laugh at myself, then get up
and go make myself another cup of coffee in
a new mug since the one I was carrying was
shattered across the snow. Getting my snow
legs back - gotta watch those slippery
corners. Great way to greet the mornin' in
two-sock weather. Woke up to five deer
outside my window this morning. Suppose they
had a laugh at me as well."
So - wait a minute. Does this mean that
celebrities are humans too? If they blog -
then they *are*?
What's the world coming to... First the de-thronement
of mainstream media, and now the de-glamourization of
stars? I'm just waiting now for Madonna to get
a blog.
It may be more though than I can take in one decade ...

|
|
|